Ok, thank you! I will need to dive deeper into that.
Thank you for the long explanation!
However, it is still not clear to me:
If the conflict is based on criticism of the instinctive self, how would an intellectual understanding solve this? The instinctive self would not stop the criticism even though the conscious mind would „counteract“ with intellectual understanding.
All the „crazy self justification“ (which in fact is the human condition) didn’t help to silence the instincts. Wrong is wrong.
Doing harm to others will left me feeling bad about it – and that’s good! Understanding 1000 times that in fact it’s necessary would not convince the instinctive self that it’s good and necessary. Would it… ?