email

Please note, all the Freedom Essays, Transformation Affirmations and More Good Info Emails can be accessed at the end of this essay. Open any essay, affirmation or email to read, print, download, share or listen to it (as a podcast).

 

 

This is More Good Info Email 6

 

Candid discussions that took place during the
WTM Global Conference, 2017

 

During the inaugural WTM Global Conference in February 2017 biologist Jeremy Griffith delivered a series of astonishingly honest and insightful presentations to the founders of WTM Centres in Zambia and Austria.

Discussion encompassed an analysis of how left-wing ideology is based on the false ‘savage instincts’ excuse; the psychological changes that occur with age under the duress of the human condition; the psychological process of Resignation and the associated ‘Ship at Sea’ state; the ‘arms race’ that underpins the world’s fraught race relations; and much more.

Watch any presentation by clicking on its video player below:

 

 

These ‘Candid discussion’ videos can also be found on the WTM’s Transformation Page.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

We encourage you to get involved and become a WTM member to help transform the world—because at last we really can!

 

Discussion or comment on this email is welcomed—see below.

 

 

 

These essays were created in 2017-2019 by Jeremy Griffith, Damon Isherwood, Fiona
Cullen-Ward, Brony FitzGerald & Lee Jones of the Sydney WTM Centre. All filming and
editing of the videos was carried out by Sydney WTM members James Press & Tess Watson
during 2017-2019. Other members of the Sydney WTM Centre are responsible for the
distribution and marketing of the videos/​essays, and for providing subscriber support.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT





Please note, we encourage constructive discussion about this information and so reserve the right to moderate or decline posts that we feel are not relevant or inappropriate. In particular, with the subject of the human condition being so confronting, malice can easily occur, and where comments are deemed to be motivated not by objectivity but by malice, they will be declined. It has to be appreciated that the possibility of malice toward this subject matter is very real, and we have a responsibility to manage that as best we can.