Dear Drou,
 
This information produces a paradigm shift in understanding and so it makes sense that it will take a little bit of time to absorb what is being presented. In the case of this breakthrough explanation of the human condition, absorbing what is being presented is even more difficult than it just being a new paradim, because, as is explained in Video/Freedom Essay 1 and further in Video/Freedom Essay 11, we humans have also lived in deep psychological fear of the issue of the human condition, which is the question of why, when the ideals are to be loving and selfless, are we so competitive and selfish. And so it makes sense that when the issue is finally addressed and explained that our minds will initially struggle to take in or ‘hear’ what’s being presented, which is what we call the ‘deaf effect’. We block out most of what’s being said from entering our mind and can feel that the presentation is overly repetitious or that it contains nothing new or original.
 
Bearing that in mind, it might be worth me quickly running through the chain of logic that links the Introductory Series, to help you see the profundity and importance of what is being presented. The important opening video to our Freedom Essay series, Video/ F. Essay 1: ‘Your block to the most wonderful of all gifts’, quickly describes and explains how to overcome the ‘deaf effect’ difficulty of accessing this fabulous world-saving and life-transforming understanding of the human condition that the whole human race has lived in hope, faith and trust would one day be found.
 
This Video/Freedom Essay 2, explains that historically, we have tried to argue that our competitive and selfish behaviour is due to savage instincts within us. But it is pointed out in this video/essay, that our behaviour is psychologically driven, and whats more our instincts are to be cooperative and loving, and so arguing that we have savage instincts is just an excuse, which means the all-important issue of the human condition has, until now, remained unresolved.
 
Video/Freedom Essay 3 then presents the all-important REAL explanation for our human condition. In this short video, biologist Jeremy Griffith outlines his breakthrough explanation of the human condition — that when humans developed a conscious mind some 2 million years ago, a battle unavoidably developed between it and our pre-established instincts. Jeremy explains that this conflict between our intellect and instincts caused our species to become psychologically defensive, angry, alienated and egocentric — the aggressive and competitive state we refer to as the human condition. And with the ability now to explain this conflict, all those insecure, defensive behaviours are obsoleted, brought to an end — we are freed from the human condition!
 
Video/Freedom Essay 4 then demonstrates how readily apparent the instinct vs intellect elements of the human condition are when someone is prepared to think honestly and truthfully about the subject.
 
In Video/Freedom Essay 5, it is explained how this transformation occurs. Very briefly, now that we have found understanding of our conflicted and distressed human condition, all our old behaviours of anger, egocentricity and alienation that we had to employ to cope while we couldn’t defend ourselves with understanding are no longer needed. Every human can now take up a magnificent, unburdened, human-condition-free, transformed life. It may take some time for people to realise that this is what is says it is, as with any new scientific breakthrough in history, but once this catches on, the infectious enthusiasm and selfless love it liberates will spread like wildfire.
 
And then Drou, Freedom Essay 11 that I referred to at the beginning, further explains our historic fear of the human condition — how it has been the proverbial ‘elephant in our living rooms’ but one that we couldn’t look at because it brings us face to face with our capacity to behave appallingly – our ‘dark side’. So we humans have, in effect, been in a ‘catch 22’: we needed the solution before we could even start thinking about the problem. Which means, you need to be patient, and give yourself time to absorb this information, because it doesn’t take long, and I assure you it is everything it says it is.

Hi Maurice. Thank you for your interest in the WTM. Jeremy explains in Chapter 4:4 of his definitive book, FREEDOM: The End Of The Human Condition, that ‘as the study of physics has shown, our world is made up of three fundamental ingredients—time, space, and energy—with, as Einstein revealed in his famous formula E = mc2, energy taking the form of matter, which comprises the 94 or so naturally occurring elements that, when subjected to the laws of physics, particularly the law of Negative Entropy, became ordered or integrated; they formed more stable or enduring (in time) and ever larger (in space) arrangements.’ In Chapter 4:2 of FREEDOM, or Freedom Essay 23, Jeremy explains that the development of order of matter on Earth — or ‘Negative Entropy’ — begins when in an open system, energy can come into the system from outside it, in Earth’s case from the sun. There is a tremendous selfless order to life on Earth and the the reason humanity seems so out of synch with that is because we suffer from the human condition. To return to peace and harmony we must address this all-important issue and it is exactly this longed-for breakthrough explanation of the human condition that Jeremy has found.

As you will see from Freedom Essays 3 and 4, the instinct vs intellect explanation is completely rational and fully accountable, and in fact, finding understanding of our psychologically troubled human condition is the only thing that can heal it. This information is the antithesis of dangerous and flawed.
 
With regard to your second point, as you will see from Freedom Essay 21, humans in fact have a moral soul, developed from a time when our ape ancestors lived cooperatively and lovingly, so we do reject your second point, the idea of moral relativism. Also it’s very important to note that this biological understanding of the human condition which explains why we became upset as a species doesn’t condone or sanction ‘evil’, rather, through bringing understanding to humans’ upset behaviour, it gives us the power to ameliorate and thus subside and ultimately eliminate it.
 
In answer to your third statement, it has been argued very thoroughly why the ‘savage instincts’ excuse for human behaviour has been adopted so widely by humans including the scientific community and why that is fundamentally wrong (see Freedom Essays 4 and 14 for example). The key biological distinction that needs to be made is that humans suffer from the conscious-mind-based, psychologically troubled human condition, not the genetic-opportunism-based, animal condition. And while the redeeming instinct vs intellect explanation for our psychologically troubled condition may initially be confronting, it is not arcane or esoteric at all; in fact the more you digest it, the more you realise just how simple and accountable it is, and as Freedom Essay 4 details, the intellect and instinct elements have been recognised by many of history’s great thinkers as being responsible for our condition.