Please note, links to all the Freedom Essays are included at the end of this essay. Open any essay to read, print, download, share or listen to it (as a podcast).



This is Freedom Essay 38


Noah’s Ark explained


The following explanation of the Biblical story of Noah’s Ark is a condensation of paragraphs 743 – 751 of Jeremy Griffith’s 2016 book, FREEDOM.

Now that we can understand and resolve the underlying issue in all of human life of the human condition (see Video/​F. Essay 3) it finally becomes possible to explain and demystify all mythology, including the Biblical story of Noah’s Ark.


Noah’s Ark, Italianate mural painting, mid 16th century studiolo

Noah’s Ark, Italianate mural painting, mid-16th century studiolo


As was explained in F. Essay 30, Resignation occurs when adolescents become so depressed from trying to understand why they, and everyone else, are so competitive, aggressive and selfish when their moral instinctive self or soul expects humans to behave cooperatively, lovingly and selflessly, that they give up trying to confront and think about the problem. It was pointed out that this process of Resignation to living in denial of this most fundamental and all-important issue of the corrupted or ‘fallen’ state of humanswhich is the issue of ‘the human condition’was such a compromising adjustment it was the most significant psychological event in human life.

Metaphorically, Resignation represented the time when humans began hiding deep underground in Plato’s dark cave away from the condemning glare of their moral soul, the result of which was a horrific life of soul-dead alienation. (Plato’s cave allegory is explained in Video/​F. Essay 11.) But again, such an existence was preferable to trying to live with the suicidal depression that came from trying to live with the condemnation of our moral soul. (See F. Essay 21 for the explanation of the origin of our moral instincts or soul.) It was a case of either stay alive and accept living a psychologically dead life of soul-less alienation, or die from suicidal depression. That humans have chosen to stay alive but accept psychological death is a measure of the immense heroism of the human raceand thank goodness understanding of the human condition has at last been found and humans no longer have to resign to living in a state of soul-dead alienation.


Man in cave

Virtually all adolescents go through Resignation, the agonising psychological process of
leaving behind the innocent, soulful, all-loving world, for a life of denial in Plato’s dark cave


Of course, when humans resigned they couldn’t admit they had done soyou can’t maintain a denial of something if you admit you’re denying it!which is why the agony that resigning adolescents went through could not be acknowledged and was instead evasively and dishonestly blamed on their brain’s development and hormonal change; we needed some excuse for the enormous psychological transition that resigning to a life of denial represented. The whole issue of humans’ corrupted condition had to be avoided until the human condition could be truthfully explained, which, mercifully, it now is.

So, the most important psychological event in human life of Resignation has been denied by the cave-dwelling, mechanistic world of resigned adults. However, while this has been the case in the resigned world, the Bible has long been humanity’s outstanding book of denial-free truth, and so we could expect that Resignation would be recognised in it, and it isit is what the story of Noah’s Ark is all about. Moreover, the story also deals with a very important question that F. Essay 30 about Resignation doesn’t discuss, which is when did Resignation become a normal event in the history of human life?

I say ‘a normal event’ because Resignation was not always the universal phenomena it is today. It is the upset from a lack of nurturing in infancy and early childhood that makes self-confrontation during the thoughtful early adolescent stage overwhelmingly depressing, and this lack of nurturing (in-effect, the human-condition-afflicted, alienated, detached-from-their-all-loving-soulful-self state of parents) was not an outstanding feature of human life until the final stages of humanity’s journey from ignorance to enlightenmentso it follows that Resignation would not have become the key feature in human life until the latter stages of humanity’s journey. It would not have been a feature of the lives of Homo habilis, or Homo erectus, or even the subsequent H. sapiens. We can expect that Resignation would have only appeared during the 200,000 year reign of H. sapiens sapiens, and only become almost universal in the final 11,000 years of that reign after agriculture and the domestication of plants and animals allowed humans to live in close proximity, a development that greatly increased the spread and levels of upset in humans. (See chapter 8:15 of FREEDOM for more on the final 11,000 years of humanity’s journey.)


A series of seven human fossil skulls arranged in order of increasing brain case size and corresponding species maturation.

The full story of humanity’s journey is explained in chapter 8 of FREEDOM


The reason Resignation is not completely universal, is that while distressing and even depressing, the upset from a developing mind’s own efforts to self-adjust is not sufficient to cause the mind to have to pay the very high price of blocking out our instinctive self or soul’s happy, all-loving and all-sensitive world because of the condemning expectation it gives rise to that we should still be behaving in that all-loving, cooperative, selfless way. No, upset and its effects have to be very great for humans to pay that very high price of killing off their soul by resigning, and while upset and its effects are very great in modern humans and as a result Resignation is almost universal, the fact that even amongst modern humans there have been adults who didn’t need to resign, such as the denial-free thinking prophets Abraham, Moses, Plato and Christ, is evidence that the extreme upset that leads to Resignation is not yet an intrinsic part of the human make-up. (Christ and the life of denial-free prophets are explained in the next essay, F. Essay 39.)

Further, for adult members of the relatively innocent representative ‘races’ of H. sapiens sapiens living today, such as the Bushmen of the Kalahari and the Australian Aborigines, to be as happy and full of the zest and enthusiasm for life and as generous, selfless and free in spirit as numbers of them are, or at least were when they were still living as hunter-foragers, means that many of them must not have resigned.


Kalahari bushmen smiling holding melon

Bushmen or San people of the Kalahari


So the evidence is that the world of soundness and happiness is not far below the surface in humans todaywhich, incidentally, means that while there must be a degree of genetic adaption to a resigned, soul-destroyed existence in humans now, a sound, sensitive and happy life is retrievable for all humans. What is presented in F. Essay 15 and in chapter 9 of FREEDOM about the Transformation that this information makes possible, evidences that this is true. Resignation, with the soul-dead insensitive and must-prove-yourself mean and unsatisfying life that went with it, is fundamentally a mental, psychological condition, not an immutable genetic condition (see Video/​F. Essay 14 & F. Essay 40), so you can choose to leave that insecure, embattled, insensitive, mean and unhappy life behind. (see par. 743 of FREEDOM)

This denial-free understanding of when Resignation became almost universalabout 11,000 years ago when, as mentioned, the advent of agriculture and the domestication of animals brought humans together in close proximity, the effect of which was to rapidly spread and compound upset behaviourat last makes it possible to appreciate that Moses’ Genesis account of Noah’s Ark is actually a metaphorical description of this time when Resignation ‘flooded’ the world and our soul and all its truths ‘went under’. Our all-sensitive and lovingalthough unbearably condemning of our self-adjusting conscious selfsoulful self was, in effect, ‘drowned’ when we resigned; it was repressed, pushed into our subconscious, out of conscious awareness, and our extremely superficial and artificial, living-only-on-the-meniscus-of-existence, highly competitive, ‘I-only-care-about-proving-my-worth’, egocentric way of living became all-dominant. The only creatures to escape the horror of Resignation, to survive this ‘drowning’ of our soul, were the animals and the very few well-nurtured-with-unconditional-love, sound and secure unresigned prophets, as symbolised in this case by Noah and his zoo. As Moses says in Genesis, ‘Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked with God [he did not have to deny Integrative Meaning]…​God saw how corrupt the earth had become, for all the people on earth had corrupted their ways. So God said to Noah, “…​make yourself an ark…​I am going to bring floodwaters on the earth…​Everything on earth will perish [the soul and all the denial-free truths will perish when people resign to a life of denial]. But I will establish my covenant with you [but from here on prophets will have to preserve the truth of Integrative Meaning and all the other great truths that relate to it], and you will enter the ark…​Go into the ark [don’t resign], you and your whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation”’ (6:9, 12, 14, 17, 18; 7:1). (See F. Essay 23 for an explanation of ‘God’ or Integrative Meaning.)

In the following depiction of Noah’s Ark we see dead people littered everywhere, and, as was pointed out above, Resignation is a form of death. The ‘dove’ that Noah ‘sent out’ ‘to see if the water had receded’ (8:8), kept coming back because the world was still floodedResignation was still universalbecause it is only now with the human condition finally understood that the need to resign can end. The time that Moses prophesised would eventually be possible, when the ‘dove’ will never need to ‘return’ (8:12) to the Ark, has finally been realised.


‘The Dove Sent Forth From The Ark’. Engraving by Gustave Dore, 1866

The Dove Sent Forth From The Ark, Gustave Doré, 1866


So Moses knew all about Resignation, including how it became all but universal. And, as with his accounts of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden of our species’ original, cooperative and loving innocence, and of the lives of Cain and Abel that describe how humanity has progressed from a state of innocence to a state of upset, and how, following the advent of agriculture, that progression eventually led to warfare (more about Moses’ Adam and Eve and Cain and Abel stories is explained in par. 906 of FREEDOM), he used a story to pass down that knowledge through generations of humans who were resigned to living in denial of the true nature of the human condition. Moseswho wrote not just Genesis but the first five books of the Biblewas certainly an exceptional unresigned, denial-free-thinking prophet. To think people have actually searched for remnants of an ark, and tested ice cores from glaciers and sea beds in the Black Sea for proof of a great flood in the past, as if the story depicted an actual event rather than the metaphor/​allegory it really is! Understandably, howeverin a development that is discussed in F. Essay 35 and elaborated upon in ch. 8:16I of FREEDOMthe more upset and thus insecure humans became, the less they could afford to confront the truths contained in religious scriptures and the more they needed to interpret their contents in literal and fundamentalist wayslike ‘God is actually a person sitting in the clouds somewhere’, ‘Christ was actually physically resurrected from death’, ‘Christ’s mother was actually a virgin’, ‘Abraham actually considered murdering his son’, ‘Judgment day actually heralds an afterlife in which some unlucky souls will be judged as evil and burnt in a fiery pit’, etc, etc. But with the upset state of the human condition now defended, all religious metaphorical descriptions, parables and symbolsin fact, all mythologycan be safely explained and demystified, as is shown throughout FREEDOM and in the compilation of all my work, the book Freedom Expanded.


Sarcastic image of when God gives free will to Man

While the above comment is intended as a criticism of the Bible, it actually reveals the
accuracy of the Noah’s Ark metaphor: how the emergence of consciousness resulted in
criticism from our moral instinctive self, which led to Resignation becoming almost universal.


Indeed, with understanding of the human condition found, the Bible’s entire contents can be fully demystified nowan exercise that will likely amaze the reader because they will discover that, unlike all the libraries of denial-complying books in the world, the Bible is, as mentioned, a repository of extremely rare denial-free truth. In fact, virtually the whole story of the human condition, bar its scientific explanation, is perfectly described in the Bible, albeit in the abstract, metaphysical and metaphorical terms that denial-free, truthful-thinking prophets were limited to in those early pre-science times when the Bible was written. The reformist theologian Martin Luther recognised the comparative integrity of the Bible when he said, ‘Homer, Virgil, and other noble, fine, and profitable writers, have left us books of great antiquity; but they are nought to the Bible’ (Table Talk, 1566; tr. William Hazlitt, 1857, p.1). No wonder it is the world’s bestselling and most widely distributed book, with 6 billion copies having been printed so far. And I might conclude by mentioning that just as people practise regularly re-reading the Bible because its denial-free, out-of-Plato’s-cave, soul-filled honesty is so aligning for soul-repressed, alienated, lost humans, so people will discover that the more they re-read FREEDOM, the more it will re-connect them to their soul and clear their mind of alienationbut in an infinitely more effective way, because the denial-free truth it contains is both reconciling of our upset state and based on first-principle science, which means it is infinitely more explanatory, clarifying and understandable, and thus infinitely more soul-aligning and mind-clearing.


– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

For further demystification of religion and religious metaphors, we recommend F. Essay 39: Christ explained and F. Essay 40: Judgment Day finally explained. You can also read much more about humanity’s heroic journey in chapter 8 of FREEDOM.


Discussion or comment on this essay is welcomedsee below.




These essays were created in 2017-2021 by Jeremy Griffith, Damon Isherwood, Fiona
Cullen-Ward, Brony FitzGerald & Lee Jones of the Sydney WTM Centre. All filming and
editing of the videos was carried out by Sydney WTM members James Press & Tess Watson
during 2017-2021. Other members of the Sydney WTM Centre are responsible for the
distribution and marketing of the videos/​essays, and for providing subscriber support.



By clicking ‘Submit’ you confirm that you have read, understood and accept the WTM’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The WTM will only contact you in relation to this enquiry and will manage all personal information in accordance with its Privacy Policy.

Please note, to ensure constructive discussion we moderate comments (which may take some hours) and may not publish any we feel are motivated by malice, or that make criticisms already addressed and repudiated, or ask questions already prominently answered on our comprehensive website with its many freely available books, essays and FAQs that can be easily searched electronically.

  • Frank B on June 23, 2017 at 10:04 pm

    Noahs Ark is a remarkable metaphor used for when the human race, well except for a few, had no option but to resign to a life of never talking about the seemingly obvious imperfections of themselves and the world around them namely the soul repression and the denial of it ever happening (resigning) or it ever existing (your soul). Pretty gloomy stuff! It shows what an incredible psychological adjustment it is to resign, to kill ones soul off! Horrific, it is a real death and yet we had no choice until the answers arrived here today in FREEDOM. But thankfully needing to resign is still not part of our intrinsic make up yet.

    Loved reading the paragraph, its going on the wall:
    So the evidence is that the world of soundness and happiness is not far below the surface in humans today — which, incidentally, means that while there must be a degree of genetic adaption to a resigned, soul-destroyed existence in humans now, a sound, sensitive and happy life is retrievable for all humans. What is presented in chapter 9 of FREEDOM evidences that this is true. Resignation, with the soul-dead insensitive and must-prove-yourself mean and unsatisfying life that went with it, is fundamentally a mental, psychological condition, not an immutable genetic condition, so you can choose to leave that insecure, embattled, insensitive, mean and unhappy life behind. BINGO! Wonderful, amasing incredibly awesome that the human race has been brought back form the dead!

    Yep the time that Moses prophesised would eventually become possible, when the dove will never need to return to the Ark has now been realised, its finally arrived through this great book FREEDOM.
    Oh can’t wait for the day when the whole bible will be demystified….one day.

  • nomad on June 28, 2017 at 9:03 am

    Just on an intellectual level, I find the demystification of biblical stories SO interesting. And then there is the deeper level going on, when we start to absorb that this is describing who we actually are. What amazing insights.

  • Alec on June 28, 2017 at 9:20 am

    I’m starting to see everything as clear… and meaningful.Totally blown away by this explanation.

  • James kolubah on July 11, 2017 at 10:26 am

    My comments: I am very delighted that a freedom we have been looking for all time is finally at our reach. Moses as expressed as a biblical character is not identified in any historical sources. All doings attributed to this supposed character didn’t​ exist.I applaud and appreciate freedom for the food of consciousness it brings to human afflicted situation.

  • PaulM on July 11, 2017 at 4:01 pm

    True there is conjecture about Moses’ historical life, but the important thing is the profundity of the metaphors in those first books of the bible. Adam and Eve is a metaphor for the rise of consciousness and the ensuing clash between mind and intellect. Noah is a metaphor for when what Griffith calls ‘resignation’ became virtually universal. Cain and Abel is a metaphor for the rise of what Griffith calls ‘upset’. I am not a religious man, but I do find these demystifications incredibly affecting, which probably means I am more affected by religion than I had realised. But after reading this essay and the relevant sections of his books, I find my respect increases for both the religious texts, and Griffith’s explanation of the human condition. It is very reinforcing to see that they were both saying the same thing!

  • Howard on November 30, 2017 at 2:57 pm

    as a music buff, im going to throw in this lyric from jackson browne, which i think is also using the flood metaphor to describe resignation.
    it is from his song titled ‘before the deluge’:
    “in the end, they traded their tired wings for the resignation that living brings. and exchanged love’s bright and fragile glow for the glitter and the rouge, and in a moment they were swept before the deluge.”
    what do you think people?

  • Allan Scott Helgeson on March 24, 2018 at 12:40 am

    There are numerous definitions of religion and only a few are stated here. The typical dictionary definition of religion refers to a “belief in, or the worship of, a god or gods” or the “service and worship of God or the supernatural”. However, writers and scholars have expanded upon the “belief in god” definitions as insufficient to capture the diversity of religious thought and experience.
    Urarina shaman, Peru, 1988
    Edward Burnett Tylor defined religion as “the belief in spiritual beings”. He argued, back in 1871, that narrowing the definition to mean the belief in a supreme deity or judgment after death or idolatry and so on, would exclude many peoples from the category of religious, and thus “has the fault of identifying religion rather with particular developments than with the deeper motive which underlies them”. He also argued that the belief in spiritual beings exists in all known societies.

    The anthropologist Clifford Geertz defined religion as a “system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic.” Alluding perhaps to Tylor’s “deeper motive”, Geertz remarked that “we have very little idea of how, in empirical terms, this particular miracle is accomplished. We just know that it is done, annually, weekly, daily, for some people almost hourly; and we have an enormous ethnographic literature to demonstrate it”. The theologian Antoine Vergote also emphasized the “cultural reality” of religion, which he defined as “the entirety of the linguistic expressions, emotions and, actions and signs that refer to a supernatural being or supernatural beings”; he took the term “supernatural” simply to mean whatever transcends the powers of nature or human agency.

    The sociologist Durkheim, in his seminal book The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, defined religion as a “unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things”. By sacred things he meant things “set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them”. Sacred things are not, however, limited to gods or spirits.[note 2] On the contrary, a sacred thing can be “a rock, a tree, a spring, a pebble, a piece of wood, a house, in a word, anything can be sacred”. Religious beliefs, myths, dogmas and legends are the representations that express the nature of these sacred things, and the virtues and powers which are attributed to them.

    In his book The Varieties of Religious Experience, the psychologist William James defined religion as “the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine”. By the term “divine” James meant “any object that is godlike, whether it be a concrete deity or not” to which the individual feels impelled to respond with solemnity and gravity.

    Echoes of James’ and Durkheim’s definitions are to be found in the writings of, for example, Frederick Ferré who defined religion as “one’s way of valuing most comprehensively and intensively”. Similarly, for the theologian Paul Tillich, faith is “the state of being ultimately concerned”, which “is itself religion. Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man’s spiritual life.” Friedrich Schleiermacher in the late 18th century defined religion as “a feeling of absolute dependence”. His contemporary Hegel disagreed thoroughly, defining religion as “the Divine Spirit becoming conscious of itself through the finite spirit.”

    When religion is seen in terms of “sacred”, “divine”, intensive “valuing”, or “ultimate concern”, then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms do not necessarily disturb its adherents.

    Faith is confidence or trust in a person, thing, deity, or in the doctrines or teachings of a religion or view (e.g. having strong political faith). The word faith is often used as a synonym for hope, trust or belief.

    In religion, faith often involves accepting claims about the character of a deity, nature, or the universe. While some have argued that faith is opposed to reason, proponents of faith argue that the proper domain of faith concerns questions which cannot be settled by evidence.[citation needed]

    Other examples of faith may include empirical reasoning, statistics, past experience, and other more concrete factors, such as faith in an aircraft, bridge, spouse, or pet, and so on.
    True Faith is something we exhibit every day. We have faith in the rules of existence. We believe in Gravity and that each breath we take will supply us with oxygen and that food will nourish our bodies and all other so called natural laws work. That is true faith. We do not doubt these things. If we have faith that the Universe makes sense, then we must believe that there is a benign intelligence in charge and there is no need for vindication or assurances that we understand the truth because we KNOW WHAT IS TRUE and the TRUTH allows us the freedom to be human! BE HUMAN, my friends. BE WELL and make the coming years be those where the human race regains its humanity.

  • Willow on March 29, 2018 at 8:41 pm

    I just loved reading these words: ‘The world of soundness and happiness is not far below the surface in humans today. So while there must be a degree of genetic adaption to a resigned, soul-destroyed existence in humans now, a sound, sensitive and happy life is retrievable for all humans…Resignation, with all the soul-dead insensitive and must-prove-yourself mean and unsatisfying life that went with it, is fundamentally a mental, psychological condition, not an immutable genetic condition, so you can choose to leave that insecure, embattled, insensitive, mean and unhappy life behind”. So excited was I that I went to para 743 in Freedom as suggested in the essay and then read this: ‘“all humans can immediately leave the soul-repressed, insensitive, denial-committed-and-thus-extremely-alienated, selfish and egocentric power-fame-fortune-and-glory-seeking resigned life, and become part of the secure, happy, human-condition-and-Resignation-free new world that understanding of the human condition now makes possible.”

    How good is that!! We can change and in fact completely transform our lives right now from living the horrible selfish existence of proving our self worth to living free of that wrestle and living selflessly in a way we have always dreamt of living!!!! Thank you Jeremy Griffith for gifting us with this gold that ends all the psychological suffering on the planet.

  • Ina Carcani on February 22, 2019 at 7:19 am

    The most beautiful parts you don’t have to hide to explain and only discover thank you for the they peace

  • John tembo on May 12, 2019 at 6:34 am

    Hi, this is very interesting story about moses Noah, Abraham they have done different things in he story this is great book thank you

  • William Finch on May 24, 2019 at 4:37 am

    An excellent explanation of Noah’s ark. I am enjoying all the emails.

  • Hennie Kruger on December 6, 2019 at 6:10 pm

    Yes indeed this is a way forward for all to understand themselves and get on with life.

  • Linda Susan on December 13, 2019 at 3:11 am

    Wonderful to have all these essays as podcasts.
    I have the book and am amazed at the whole layout and cross referencing.
    A gift immeasurable for heart/mind/soul.
    I just love God as the projected personification of our own integrated being in our life-world.

  • Ange on July 26, 2020 at 9:26 am

    This is one of my most favourite essays! It is a very clear, concise way of explaining resignation, which is most helpful to readers. The most illuminating part is how Jeremy explains that a sound, happy and sensitive life is achievable for all humans and that this is not far below the surface! Thank goodness for that. Let’s all get out there and get the truth up!